Change may be a constant in a school environment, but some teachers find it challenging.

Leaders can cure ‘change fatigue'

OPINION: You need to lead a significant change program at your school and are already bracing for the resistant rants of some of your colleagues.

Some will say the program simply won’t work for the department, while others will complain that it flies in the face of the school’s long tradition. Others will be resistant to change for no reason other than “We are doing just okay as we are” or the old favourite “We’ve always done it this way, why change now?”

The fact is, as a leader, you know that leading change in schools can be as disheartening as a wave crashing through your soul.

It is not that your colleagues are lazy, disinterested or even lacking the professional competence to rise to the challenge of change. It is more likely that, over time, they have become fatigued by change after experiencing the comings and goings of poorly led

change initiatives, which were often quick fixes for deep-seated educational problems. (Think outcomes-based education, phonics versus the whole language approach, or even those open-style classrooms of the 1970s.)

Despite high levels of ‘change fatigue’ in many schools and the resistance that inevitably accompanies that mental set, rapid advances in technology, changing student demographics and evolving instructional priorities mean that change remains a constant feature in the school landscape – and the pace of change is only likely to accelerate.

Breaking down resistance requires school leaders to become educational change agents who can drive instructional excellence and enhance student learning in a particular type of way.

It starts with having a clear vision and being able to communicate effectively. Describing the purpose of any proposed change with clarity is critical as your colleagues will quickly become frustrated if they feel your plans for change are ambiguous at least, or totally confused at worst.

Facilitating change requires school leaders to balance patience with persistence.

You will need to recognise that sustainable change takes time to implement. But you also need to understand that, when change does not happen fasten enough, it will allow resistant colleagues more time to push back on the change agenda. Adjusting the pace of

the situation as circumstances change is, therefore, essential.

And while adjusting the pace of change is important, preparing people for each stage of the change process is just as significant.

As a school-based change agent, keep your colleagues informed along the way as it will allow them time to voice any fears or shortcomings as they arise. This also provides you with an opportunity to address the very issues that might cause resistance and create delays.

Involving staff from right across the school will also likely pay dividends. By adopting an inclusive approach and through developing and showing empathy to everyone, it is likely that you will minimise resistance and leave your colleagues feeling valued, included and motivated.

Those leading change initiatives should work directly at building trust with those who actively resist change. So as a change agent, be prepared to meet one-on-one where possible with the most vocal resisters – avoid the temptation of delegating this task to others.

While effective change agents do take steps to directly address the concerns of resistors, at times they fall into the trap of believing that a single person can act as the sole change agent in driving larger-scale, school-based change.

This mean you should give some thought to how you might empower others around you to become and act as change agents. That will provide more on-the-ground support for those affected by change.

Of course, effective change agents recognise that some of their colleagues will always dig their heels in and refuse to budge.

It is important not to be discouraged when this happens, but to accept that there will always be obstacles.

In reality, the only way for change to be fully successful is by invitation – it can rarely be mandated.

It follows, then, that the effective school-based change agent is more concerned with positively influencing others and garnering support, and far less about top-down directives, commands and penalties.

• Professor Gary Martin is chief executive officer at the Australian Institute of Management WA


I know what you mean and I've had 'change fatigue' many times. You're right, it's the way to re-energise the base and get people engaged.

While change is easy to implement, persuading the school hierarchy is much harder.

New York
Adapt, develop, change - living with the times. Important reminder, thanks.

Well written and informative on a compelling subject that can be related to many institutional businesses other than schools. Taking the approach of a solid systemic framework for change and developing 'change agents' was quite brilliant and positive.

I think we need to reframe the whole 'change' dialogue. We aren't wired for change, as humans, but we are built for evolution. Instead of holding the imminent change management program over people, why don't we engage them instead with a simple question, "What do you see as the next evolution of our organisation?"

Interesting article, Gary. Being a change agent is an essential part of being a dynamic school leader.

Truly interesting content, Gary.

A great article to shift perspective.

Compelling share, Gary.

Yes, change occurs each every day. Leaders must be able to cascade these changes to all, which is no easy task. The delivery is essential. Thank you for sharing.

This article is about a leader who has their own plans for change, and gives advice on how they can prepare themselves and deal with ‘resistant rants’. You say “It starts with having a clear vision and being able to communicate effectively”. This is not only reasonable, the internet is full of similar information. However: -There was nothing in the article about checking with staff to get their opinions and ideas before the leader has decided the change is going to happen - it’s only after the leader has decided the change will occur do they keep “colleagues informed along the way”. -There was nothing about floating the idea early on to see if they have a good idea or not. -There was nothing about being willing to abandon the idea if those around them have good ideas for not going ahead. To me, the leader, change agent, etc, in this article is quite autocratic. The advice is all about after they’ve decided to make the change, to build trust, keep people informed etc. (And just for the record, I have no particular problems with that.) But I see many definitions and descriptions of what is a leader in posts and articles on LinkedIn, at live presentations, etc. And they have gone from 'someone who leads' or 'someone who has followers' to someone with all sorts of amazing attributes - such as consults widely, empowers others, etc. (I am not advocating these later definitions - I find the people writing them fail to replace the term ‘leader’ with ‘the sort of leader I’d like to see or have above me in the hierarchy’.) So my question is, given the leader described in the article does not fit these ‘later definitions’, what are your thoughts and feelings on the ‘later definitions’? And indeed, what is your definition of ‘leader’?

Great article, as always, from Gary Martin.

This is so true and a very well written article to showcase the importance of patience and perseverance as a school leader.

Beautifully written on a compelling subject. Worth it.

Quick fixes don’t work long term. Great article.

Very well-written article. Change can wear anyone out. Leaders need to be able to sustain change and allow their creative side to take over. Thank you for sharing.

Alexandria, VA USA
Wow, this is an amazing article. Empowering people during change is a powerful buy-in. People truly feel part of a team and want help push a mission forward.

Also get the Thesaurus out and they improve the word “change'. Who wants that anyways?

Add your comment


6th-Australian Institute of Management WA20,000
7th-Murdoch University17,883
8th↓South Regional TAFE10,835
9th-Central Regional TAFE10,000
10th-Training Course Experts10,000
51 tertiary education & training providers ranked by total number of students in WA

BNiQ Disclaimer