Site protection

ALTHOUGH prevention is the best medicine, there are a number of ways a person or company can protect themselves from being responsible for cleaning up a contaminated site.

Blake Dawson Waldron believes four basic points could be followed as a good starting point to minimise problems.

Firstly, a company could develop an environmental risk management system to mitigate the risk of contamination.

Second, a financier may request a disclosure statement from a vendor, or conduct an environmental due diligence THE Minim Cove development and the East Perth Gasworks stand out as the State’s highest profile contamination locations of recent times – due to their massive clean-up costs and high level of public awareness.

To assist developers, companies and lenders, the Department of Environmental Protection has developed a series of guidelines to help identify and assess potential contaminated sites in a staged approach.

These guidelines are available at the Department’s website

One guideline, Potentially Contaminating Activities, Industries and Land uses, provides a quick reference on the types of activities that may contaminate the environment.

In addition to the material provided by the DEP, the Environmental Protection Authority has published a guidance document entitled Guidance Statement for Remediation Hierarchy for Contaminated Land, which presents the principles to be taken into account when selecting methods for cleaning up a contaminated site.

Add your comment

BNIQ sponsored byECU School of Business and Law


6th-Australian Institute of Management WA20,000
7th-Murdoch University16,584
8th-South Regional TAFE10,549
9th-Central Regional TAFE10,000
10th-The University of Notre Dame Australia6,708
48 tertiary education & training providers ranked by total number of students in WA

Number of Employees

BNiQ Disclaimer