Search

Design and construct turnkey delivery - Owning the process.

With the new ‘normal’ level of commodity prices and lower level of capital investment the resources industry requires every dollar of investment to stretch further and the need has arisen for more cost effective, efficient and simpler project delivery.

Clients have been forced to cut back their operational and projects teams and reduced manning levels have required them to look at traditional delivery models. By allocating the project control and risk back to the contractor, clients are able to engage a ‘one stop’ solution or as we refer to it in the industry a design and construct turnkey delivery or ‘D&C’ solution.

It has been talked about as the ‘new way’ our industry ‘should’ be operating but the truth is that true D&C has only been recently re-invigorated by the industry, looking for change.

It is at this point, that I will qualify that there have been horror stories about D&C projects out there that have gone wrong… and I mean really wrong. However that is the case across all types of delivery models if they are set up wrong or have the wrong engagement process.

If a client puts together a well-defined scope of works, understands their drivers and selects a competent EPC contractor, then the benefits can well outweigh the negatives. Let’s be clear, companies have been delivering turnkey design and construct solutions since the dawn of time and there should be no reason not to continue down that same path.

Here are 3 important factors when determining whether design and construct is the contracting model you should choose:

Owning the process of design

Not only does this force contractors to be more careful and calculated in what is offered, it has also given a licence to innovate, design and deliver for cost. After all contractors should know where the money is in project delivery and how to save it. Issues with design from a third party can cause interface issues, delays, variations and disruption but under the D&C model the onus is back on the contractor to own the design, cost and schedule.

Definition is the key

Understanding and defining the key project drivers is critical to the D&C model. If the offer and tender are not clearly defined there will always be arguments over what was included, excluded and what is paid. This can happen in any type of contract, the key component to ensuring as a client that you are getting what you want is to provide a clear set of project deliverables for the contractor to submit a D&C offer.

Establish the operational parameters

Too often project operational objectives are not clearly defined and the required outcomes are not established to enable measurable success. In the resource industry, processing warranties and guarantees can be established quite easily, so there is no real reason why assessment parameters cannot be established for all types of projects.

The benefits

As a short take-away the benefits of design and construct turnkey delivery can be summed as:

+ Reduce owner’s costs

+ Encourage innovative design

+ Reduce margin on margin

+ Reduce interface issues

+ Shift the risk

+ Control the outcome

When determining your preferred contracting strategy in the future, challenge your own team and drive your project partners or contractors to deliver the best solution for your project needs. Design & construct turnkey delivery is making a real resurgence and will no doubt once again become the delivery method of choice in our industry.

______________________

Primero Group deliver turnkey design, construction and commissioning solutions for the resources sector.

www.primero.com.au

Comments

Australian Management, Adelaide S.A.
On a smaller dimension however no less dynamic is the implementation of Lean process improvement. This involves individuals within a team to assess & justify on-going reduction of waste of all description. This then allows projects to be completed in a quicker time frame, far less expense and better returns for the outside customer. By team involvement using Lean principles on a company wide basis, this becomes a Win / Win situation for all concerned.

Add your comment

Share Price

Closing price for the last 90 trading days
Source: Morningstar

BN30 Index

Index = 100 as of 4 Jan 2016
Source: Morningstar

Total Shareholder Return as at 29/09/17

1 year TSR5 year TSR
112thAtlas Iron71%-58%
170thSouth3241%0%
289thFortescue Metals Group12%13%
308thNorthern Star Resources9%36%
321stWoodside Petroleum6%3%
719 WA (and selected non WA) listed companies ranked by 1 year TSR relative to other companies with similar revenue
Source: Morningstar

Share Transactions

03/10/17
$9k Issued
29/09/17
$0 Bought
26/09/17
$27k Bought
Total value as at the date of the transaction
Source: Morningstar

Revenue

1st-Fortescue Metals Group$10,999.7m
2nd↑South32$9,392.9m
3rd-Woodside Petroleum$5,715.9m
4th↑Atlas Iron$896.6m
5th-Northern Star Resources$850.6m
489 listed resources companies ranked by revenue.
Source: Morningstar

Remuneration from Fortescue Metals Group

4thNev Power$5.324m
654thMark Barnaba$223k
773rdSharon Warburton$170k
Ranked by total remuneration from all listed WA companies

BNiQ Disclaimer