Three warnings before dismissal a dangerous myth

EMPLOYERS and employees beware. There is no rule in WA law that requires three warnings to be given before an employee can be terminated.

The three warnings rule developed as a matter of human relations policy under the Keating Government’s Federal legislation before the introduction of the 1996 Workplace Relations Act.

Under the Act, there is no specific statutory requirement to give any employee three warnings before dismissal.

Although the three warnings requirement requirement may be found in human resource policies of some large corporations, and possibly in some federal awards, as a general principle, no such requirement exists under the WA Industrial Relations Act or indeed the Federal Workplace Relations Act.

In order to determine the procedure to be adopted when terminating the services of any employee, the provisions of the applicable award or state or federal legislation must be considered.

In general terms, commissioners and magistrates will look at the overall ‘fairness’ of the procedures leading up to and including the dismissal.

This will include the reasons for dismissal, the employee’s response to prior warnings, the fairness and method of any warnings and whether they were deserved or contrived.

In looking at overall ‘fairness’, a judgement will be made on whether the reason did indeed justify the dismissal.

For example, if an employee is asked to perform duties that are quite obviously outside their skill levels or job description, then it would be deemed ‘unfair’ for an employer to dismiss that employee if those duties were not performed properly.

On the other hand, where an employee continually fails to perform his or her fairly-assigned duties and cannot, or will not, make an attempt to improve performance after ‘fair’ warning to do so, then dismissal becomes an option for the employer irrespective of the actual number of warnings.

An instant dismissal option is still available in extreme circumstances such as proven theft or fraud or where industrial or economic sabotage can be proven to have occurred.

The dismissal procedure requires extreme care and in all cases employees and employers are advised to seek specialist professional advice before terminating any employees.

• David Anderson is managing director of Bell Personnel. This article was prepared with the help of Estelle Blewett and Leanne Nickels of law firm Deacon Graham & James.

Add your comment

BNIQ sponsored byECU School of Business and Law


6th-Australian Institute of Management WA20,000
7th-Murdoch University16,584
8th-South Regional TAFE10,549
9th-Central Regional TAFE10,000
10th-The University of Notre Dame Australia6,708
47 tertiary education & training providers ranked by total number of students in WA

Number of Employees

BNiQ Disclaimer