Search
Security Interests and the PPSR – Why ABNs and ACNs matter

Security Interests and the PPSR – Why ABNs and ACNs matter

The NSW Supreme Court recently handed down a decision illustrating the importance of distinguishing ABNs and ACNs in the context of security registrations under the Personal Property and Securities Act 2009 (Cth) (Act).

Re OneSteel Manufacturing Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2017] NSWSC 21 concerned a master lease agreement for goods supplied Alleasing Pty Ltd exceeding $23,000,000, an asset financing and leasing business, and OneSteel Pty Ltd, and two rental schedules issued under the master agreement each for 6 year terms.  The leases were PPS leases within the meaning of the PPSA.

Allleasing registered it’s a financing statement by reference to OneSteel’s ABN, rather than its ACN.  Pursuant to per s 153(1) of the Act, financing statements must contain the grantor’s details as prescribed by the Personal Property Security Regulations.   Importantly, where the grantor is a body corporate the ACN must be supplied as part of the prescribed details.

The decision turned upon whether the reference to OneSteel’s ABN in lieu of its ACN rendered Allleasing’s registration ineffective.  The Court found that providing an ABN instead of an ACN in a registration of a finance statement was seriously misleading, as the omission of the ACN would not reveal the registration.  Section 302 of the Act prescribes two methods for searching the PPSR, and without registration by reference to grantor’s ACN, the registration would not be disclosed.

On this basis, the Court found that the registration was defective under s 165(b) and ineffective pursuant to s 164(1)(a) of the Act.

The Court also held that section 588FM of the Act, which allows the Court to grant an order to extend the time for registration, was not applicable to the case at hand. Section 588FM only applies if the security interest has been registered at the ‘critical’ time, often when the grantor is insolvent.

The decision provides a reminder to practitioners that great care must be taken when registering security interests on the PPSR to ensure compliance under the Act.  What may seem like a minor detail can have dire consequences for the secured party’s interests, in this case the loss of a $23,000,000 security.

Add your comment

Share Price

Closing price for the last 90 trading days
Source: Morningstar

BN30 Index

Index = 100 as of 4 Jan 2016
Source: Morningstar

Total Shareholder Return as at 29/09/17

1 year TSR5 year TSR
112thAtlas Iron71%-58%
170thSouth3241%0%
289thFortescue Metals Group12%13%
308thNorthern Star Resources9%36%
321stWoodside Petroleum6%3%
719 WA (and selected non WA) listed companies ranked by 1 year TSR relative to other companies with similar revenue
Source: Morningstar

Share Transactions

03/10/17
$9k Issued
29/09/17
$0 Bought
26/09/17
$27k Bought
Total value as at the date of the transaction
Source: Morningstar

Revenue

1st-Fortescue Metals Group$10,999.7m
2nd↑South32$9,392.9m
3rd-Woodside Petroleum$5,715.9m
4th↑Atlas Iron$896.6m
5th-Northern Star Resources$850.6m
489 listed resources companies ranked by revenue.
Source: Morningstar

Remuneration from Fortescue Metals Group

4thNev Power$5.324m
655thMark Barnaba$223k
774thSharon Warburton$170k
Ranked by total remuneration from all listed WA companies

BNiQ Disclaimer