Pecking order ousts chicken man

IT'S out – the important decision that’s been stewing in the Federal Court and now has the retail world clucking with concern.

In a financial setback for business, the court ruled retailers were not entitled to a sales tax refund on foil-lined chicken bags.

After many hours cooped up with combatants – Woolworths and the Australian Taxation Office – Justice Hely noted retailers bought foil-lined chicken bags from manufacturers.

He said: “The manufacturer includes in his invoice to the retailer an amount equal to sales tax in respect of the chicken bags and subsequently remits that to the Tax Commissioner.”

But Woolies, never too thin-skinned to tackle the Tax Commissioner, argued it was entitled to claim a refund of sale tax on the bags because they were containers to be taxed at the same rate as the contents.

But Judge Hely found in favour of the Tax Man, rather than the chicken man, reinforcing the pecking order in the real world.

Add your comment

BNIQ sponsored byECU School of Business and Law


6th-Australian Institute of Management WA20,000
7th-Murdoch University16,584
8th-South Regional TAFE10,549
9th-Central Regional TAFE10,000
10th-The University of Notre Dame Australia6,708
48 tertiary education & training providers ranked by total number of students in WA

Number of Employees

BNiQ Disclaimer