
Court rules on Hancock costs
A Supreme Court ruling has shed light on the multi-million dollar legal bills incurred by Gina Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting and Wright Prospecting in their long-running battle over ownership of the Rhodes Ridge iron ore deposit in the Pilbara.
To read more, please Login below or
Subscribe.
For first time subscribers, our monthly payment starts at $1 + GST for the first month.
For first time subscribers, our monthly payment starts at $1 + GST for the first month.
Problems, questions, feedback? Please call +61 8 9288 2100
Legal professionals
1st | ![]() | Herbert Smith Freehills | 131 |
2nd | ![]() | Clayton Utz | 91 |
3rd | ![]() | Jackson McDonald | 88 |
4th | ![]() | MinterEllison | 85 |
5th | ![]() | King & Wood Mallesons | 81 |
141 law firms and patent attorneys ranked by total number of legal professionals (add a-d)
Number of Employees
Law Firms and Patent Attorneys
3rd | Jackson McDonald | 171 | |
4th | Lavan | 151 | |
5th | Clayton Utz | 148 | |
6th | King & Wood Mallesons | 147 | |
7th | MinterEllison | 127 |
Add your comment