Search

All is not lost for Kimberley development

While Woodside’s decision on James Price Point is a disappointment, it doesn’t mean economic development of the Kimberley should be put in the too-hard basket.

Login

(existing subscribers)

The password field is case sensitive.
Request new password

Add your comment

Share Price

Closing price for the last 90 trading days
Source: Morningstar

BN30 Index

Index = 100 as of 4 Jan 2016
Source: Morningstar

Top 10 Shareholders

Substantial shareholders as published in the annual report.
Source: Morningstar

Total Shareholder Return as at 30/09/19

1 year TSR5 year TSR
39thFortescue Metals Group160%29%
438thWoodside Petroleum-12%1%
449thMineral Resources-13%13%
556thSouth32-30%
787thOM Holdings-69%0%
733 WA (and selected non WA) listed companies ranked by 1 year TSR relative to other companies with similar revenue
Source: Morningstar

Share Transactions

30/08/19
$23k Bought
30/08/19
$40k Bought
30/08/19
$48k Bought
Total value as at the date of the transaction
Source: Morningstar

Revenue

1st-Fortescue Metals Group$14,366.2m
2nd-South32$10,711.5m
3rd-Woodside Petroleum$7,536.1m
4th-Mineral Resources$1,520.1m
5th↑OM Holdings$1,512.4m
486 listed resources companies ranked by revenue.
Source: Morningstar

BNiQ Disclaimer